Monday, January 3, 2011

Fear-Peace-Fear & 3 Forms of Anxiety

>Fear -Peace -Fear: When I placed candles in the background I didn't even think about any significance they may have, but after reading what you wrote (Allan) especially the idea of 'peace' I could not stop thinking about my days as a small boy. Usually during my primary school holidays, my parents used to take me to my grandmother's farm and during some evenings the old lady would ask me to go and collect some firewood in a shed outside of her kitchen. Because of my fear of the dark, I would insist that she lights a candle for me to carry to the firewood barn. And for as long as I carried the candle all my fears were gone and I had my peace too. Now, one night she told me that if you move with a candle in the dark then people are going to see you from afar and they may attack you before you know it. As soon as I had that knowledge, my fear of the dark changed to a new fear of being seen from afar by some dangerous people. What used to signify peace and safety (a candle) for me changed into something that would make me vulnerable or attract enemies. This interests me a lot and I would look at it as from 'Fear to Peace and to Fear again'.

On a different note, in my readings I stumbled upon C. G. Boeree's (2011, Jan 03) writings about Sigmund Freud's philosophy on: http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/freud.html

C.G. Boeree wrote that Freud once said, "Life is not easy." And: -- if you -- feel threatened, feel overwhelmed, feel as if it were about to collapse under the weight of it all. This feeling is called , and it serves as a signal to the ego ... and without it the survival of the whole organism, is in jeopardy.Freud mentions three different kinds of anxieties: The first one is realistic anxiety, which you and I would call fear. Actually Freud did, too, in German. But his translators thought "fear" too mundane! Nevertheless, if I throw you into a pit of poisonous snakes, you might experience realistic anxiety. The second is moral anxiety. This is what we feel when the threat comes not from the outer, physical world, but from the internalized social world of the superego. It is, in fact, just another word for feelings like shame and guilt and the fear of punishment. The last is neurotic anxiety.This is the fear of being overwhelmed by impulses from the id. He said, if you have ever felt like you were about to "lose it," lose control, your temper, your rationality, or even your mind, you have felt neurotic anxiety.He further pointed out that, neurotic is actually the Latin word for nervous, so this is nervous anxiety. It is this kind of anxiety that intrigued Freud most, and we usually just call it anxiety, plain and simple.

Now the definition of anxiety as well as the three distinctions he makes, are things I had not taken my time to think about before. It is very easy to lump all the three forms of anxieties under one umbrella and sometimes try to address them like they are the same yet they have different sources and different effects. I find the neurotic anxiety as pointing directly to the discipline of Psychology and probably Freud's psychoanalysis. Just to digress a little bit I always remember having to debate one of Freud's classical definitions of religion as "an infantile neurosis" in my studies in Philosophy of Religion.In this he argues that religion has much to do with a people's mindset and the nostalgic effects of their childhood and they do not want to grow up but they would rather remain as kids whereby they look up to some adults or father figures in their lives, and so on.

Anywhere, I had not come across a writing that discusses the three categories of anxiety by highlighting on what fear does to the nervous system sometimes. I do not know what others think about such three distinctions of anxieties brought out in this article?

1 comment:

  1. A while ago, when Kurt had finished a formal semester of study that we recorded in a blog, he saved the entire thing to PDF. We need to be sure we know how to do that since what you wrote in the above posting is very very fine in many many ways.

    The shifting perception of the candle related to your situation....it is perhaps an emblematic narration....one that raises a point that is truly worth pursuing.

    The literary critic Harold Bloom has written that the two greatest influences on our concept of what it means to be human were Shakespeare and Freud. Things they made up have entered into many languages and thus into our consciousness in "shaping ways". As his career moved along I think Bloom tilted more toward Shakespeare (wrote an essay and book called: Shakespeare: Invention of the Human.

    The Freudian distinctions I think are potentially "useful". In this regard I think anything you read by Freud has to be critically vetted....and if it seems to make claims for a larger grasp of the human condition? These have to be examined critically. After that one can use his work "at will". But I think the trick there is to consciously bend it to your use/purpose. And of course, since Freud's work is so famous and has so many people who've used his work "foundationally" as an understanding about humans and the human condition, that you have to explain your "swerve" from what seemed to be his meanings/implications/desired outcomes.

    Within that view is lodged the power of thinking/writing and using language to craft and expression of something you want to get at.

    Such that....one could provisionally accept the Freudian framework....and then develop it differently....through a different kind of analysis. In these cases, one credits the point-of-departure....but then one is in a new landscape.

    I will come back and reread your postings more....and may have more thoughts about it. It's really fine.

    ReplyDelete